Gyakuten Kenji 2 OST: Gregory Edgeworth ~ A Defense Attorney’s Knowledge
Saturday, November 5th, 2011 at
2:38 am
Composed by Noriyuki Iwadare.
Video Rating: 5 / 5
Prosecutors and a defense attorney for a Florida mother charged in the death of her 2-year-old daughter each presented new, vastly different theories of how the little girl died as the trial for Casey Anthony began Tuesday. (May 24)
Video Rating: 1 / 5
@pikachurulez They said that they may localise it, but that the localisation would be for the 3DS probably.
@willashley23 I don’t think they are planning to release the game here, which really sucks.
When is this game coming out in the US?
@MrEvilPhoenix Honestly, weirder than i thought it would sound like…
Truly hardboiled.
I wonder what his Objection voice will sound like?
Yay! I love his theme!
Nice lightsaber…Oh wait, Thats the dislike bar. Everyone knows how guilty you are casey, And you can’t deny it. Theres just no way. I’ve seen footage of you partying, and it was uploaded the day Caylee died. Its obvious you knew some way to kill her.
*~RIP Caylee, We love you so much and we know your in a better place, where no one can hurt you. ~*
<33
she can sit there and cry all she wants cuz I know she’s guilty
@knals16 very true i agree
How can they even say Caylee drowned in the pool when George said the last time he saw Caylee was June 16, 2008? Remember, George said Caylee and Casey LEFT the Anthony residence that day, so I doubt they both came back within those 31 days to go swim in the family pool. Something doesn’t add up, she never drowned in no damn pool. Casey gave her the chloroform to knock her out while she went out and partied, but gave her too much and it killed her. So she put her body in the trunk.
PUT A SOCK IN YOU PIE HOLE ASSWIPE. SHE WENT ON THE INTERNET AND GOT SOME STUFF TO KNOCK THE KID OUT SO SHE COULD PARTY WITH THE KID QUIETLY IN PASSED OUT IN THE TRUNK. THE OL MAN IS ADMITTING TO MOLESTATION TO SAVE THE CUNTS LIFE. AFTER THE KID DIED OF AN OVERDOSE OF THE STUFF SHE PARTIED AND DID DRUGS. HOW DO YOU LIVE WITH YOURSELF MR. LAWYER? RIP CALEY.
@Vegheadsrock Tha’ts what I’m saying! I don’t think mentioning it would change the matter at hand.
@a7xbfm23 It’s our business now because America has to clean up their mess. We have to boycott all networks paying for interviews with her, her parents or her legal teams, all book deals, call in and complain, all to keep that bitch from profiting from the fact that she, at the very least was neglectful and didn’t report her daughter deceased, disposed of her body and lied to the world about it for six months.
She doesn’t deserve a million dollars for that. I assume even you agree?
@a7xbfmv23 No, you weren’t talking about the jurors. I was talking about the jurors because if it isn’t our business it was definitely theirs.
@knals16 i’m not talking about the jurors i’m talking about the people in the social network, i didn’t need a review of the trial i know who fucked up when it comes to that. But that’s not what i’m talking about
They refused to acknowledge that “bad behavior” is circumstantial evidence, especially when it revolves around lying about the location of your deceased child and hanging out at blockbuster cuddling with your boyfriend the same day your child dies.
Either way, Yes, I think those jurors are retards, they are lazy morons, they are fools and they let a killer walk and I’ll continue to say so. The best I can do to avoid offending you is to not reply to your posts anymore, so I won’t.
They also would have made an effort to study the forensic evidence in the trunk, meaning they would have gone over it all again, because it was complicated information. None of them took notes. They refused to judge Casey, but they had no problem judging George.
The foreman said straight out that he thought George might have killed Caylee, due to the skill he had in “reading people.” Other jurors have stated they couldn’t get those unproven sexual abuse claims out of their head.
@a7xbfmv23 One of them just finally threw his hands up and said “whatever you guys want” because according to juror #2, he knew they weren’t going to change their minds. Another one was upset at letting her go but then used this excuse “I agreed to follow the law”, EXCEPT he didn’t follow the law. If he had followed the law he would have given circumstantial evidence the weight it it’s supposed to be accorded, they would have realized penalty doesn’t come in until the next phase.
@a7xbfmv23 Sweetie, could you learn how to spell business?
Either way, you know whose business it was? The jurors who saw the exact same trial I did, and during their eleven hours of deliberation refused to review at any of the evidence, considered possible penalty, factored cause of death into their deliberations. It was THEIR JOB to judge and they just threw their hands up, they “started to look at the evidence” and then quit, 6 of them caved from aggravated child abuse charges in a day.
@a7xbfmv23 WOW! Amazingly put! Totally agreed
@CALICOTV301 Okay, I’m going on a tirade now even though I said I wasn’t going to. I need to get off youtube. Now. I’ll finish replying to you later.
@CALICOTV301 The reason why? It would have helped Casey. It would have gotten her out of jail. I don’t presume to know what was in her head and how she would react during an accident, but I do know that when she was being grilled by the detectives, she was cool as a cucumber and she refused to change her story. When she got thrown in jail, she was more interested in explaining why it wasn’t her fault and calling her boyfriend. If she could prove it wasn’t her fault, why didn’t she?
@CALICOTV301 The reason why? It would have helped Casey. It would have gotten her out of jail. I don’t presume to know what was in her head and how she would react during an accident, but I do know that when she was being grilled by the detectives, she was cool as a cucumber and she refused to change her story. When she got thrown in jail, she was more interested in explaining why it wasn’t her fault and calling her boyfriend. If she could prove it wasn’t her fault, why didn’t she?
@CALICOTV301 The prosecution has never insulted me. They laid out a clear cut case and provided all the proof needed. The defense laid out a fairytale and named it “reasonable doubt.” Once someone repeatedly tailors and changes their story, I just flat out don’t believe them any more and I think to do so is very foolish. If someone else were involved, Casey would have ratted them out a long time ago. If it had been an accident, or Casey had “had a seizure” that would have been brought up before.
@CALICOTV301 I’ll talk to you later.
@CALICOTV301 Doubt = Casey saying Caylee got kidnapped by aliens and Jose showing a bunch of pictures of little green men and saying that we don’t know for sure they don’t exist. Is that reasonable? No.
Anyways, I can’t debate this with you right now. I’m too pissed. I just read the latest story: that Casey’s parents are going to say that Casey probably had a seizure while Caylee was drowning and that also explains her behavior afterwards. It’s a crock of shit. I can’t be nice right now.
@knals16 exactly :I theres a difference between posting a long winded opinion on condeming a woman who was found innocent and going on here and studying the case. i hate to see this thats why i’m here in the first place, but it’s none of my bussines either
@knals16 do you see me condeming her and spewing out self rightious bs? its nobodies bussines to say they’re better than casey when they don’t know her or the victims or the family. to say it’s no bodies bussines i mean its wrong that its put out on the media and its on youtube, it’s not my bussines either but i’m not exploiting it or trying to post comments saying i hope she dies or anyother type of accusation when she was innocent regardless of an opinion to say otherwise
@knals16 Let’s do it this way. Say you never knew about a child involvement. Now, I brought information to you and said, X, Y, Z. Everything you’ve told me, but you never knew about a child, body, etc. I just told you what you told me, then I said “is she a murderer and can we give her death.” What would your answer be? Just based on her being a sociapath, a party girl, etc. Exclude anything about a child. I just said, is she a murderer based on that information. You’d say?
@knals16 After 3 years in prison and 23 hours in the same place, why wouldn’t you? In addition, if someone has asked you the same question 2000 times, and you told them no already, why should you not dodge the 2001st question. I mean, she didn’t get upset, and she didn’t have a nervous dismeanor. As a juror, it’s your job to not get in the case, but to assess it based on the information you are given, not with emotion.
@knals16 Reasonable doubt = doubt. You’re either sure or you’re unsure. You should be as insulted by the prosecution. Meaning, you can build any story you want with the evidence you have. People aren’t here to build stories. What are your charging her with and on what grounds Knals? If it fair for me to charge u with the same based on you watching shows like first 48 and terminator 2? I mean, what can you factually charge her with? Let’s be honest here